Customs penalties in the EU

To access this video please

Sign up or Login

Additionally, for all newcomers we give 5 paid articles for free.

View plans

Members have access to all videos, articles and online events! See membership plans (if you are a member, please log in)

Item added to cart

{{ courseItem.title }}
Item added to cart

{{ subscription.title }}

{{ title }}

{{ current_question.title }}

{{ successMessage }}

Download your certificate

{{ failMessage }}

{{ successMessage }}

Download your certificate

{{ failMessage }}

{{ failMessageRetry }}

{{ question.title }}

 Question anwered incorrectly. {{ question.explanation }}

At least one answer needs be selected to proceed.
View plans

Members have access to all videos, articles and online events! See membership plans (if you are a member, please log in)

Item added to cart

{{ courseItem.title }}
Item added to cart

{{ subscription.title }}
Overview Resources

The topic of penalties has been a long-running one in the EU, and the proposed EU Reform package again refers to the desirability of harmonising penalties for customs infringements. But what do we mean by 'penalties'? UCC Art. 42 - Each Member State shall provide for penalties for failure to comply with the customs legislation. Such penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

There is no harmonisation of penalties in the EU. Nevertheless, there are general principles that can be tested at the EU level.

Topics covered in this video:

  • Minor and unspecified penalties
  • Administrative penalties - Ireland
  • Penalties geared to the loss of revenue
  • Penalties for Offences - Ireland
  • Differences in the EU member states

Please find the slides and the Court of Justice of the EU Case C-653/22 in the resources. 

This video is a part of the record of a webinar 'Monthly EU law news overview', watch the other part, the EU law news overview here.

  • Publication date: December 17, 2023
  • Unlock duration: 2 months
  • Prepared by: Anthony Buckley
  • Video duration: 26min 58sec
  • Languages: English
  • Type: Web/Seminar recording
  • Topic: violations
  • Market: EU - European Union

Resources are available after purchase.

Comments ()

Similar content

Perspective
icon
EU sanctions system and the new Customs Code
27-10-2024

The topic of sanctions is of particular importance in EU Customs Law, as sanctions are relevant tools for ensuring the proper enforcement of the latter in EU Member States. In this regard, the … Proposal of 17 May 2023 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority, and repealing Regulation (EU) No. 952/2013, highlights the negative effects of the lack of harmonization in terms of customs sanctions. It is emphasized therein that customs penalties vary greatly across Member States and are subject to evolution over time; in addition, the significant divergences between Member States in the application of sanctions against breaches of customs legislation can lead to a distortion of competition, loopholes and “customs shopping”.

Prof Fabrizio Vismara

€
violations
Perspective
icon
EU sanctions system and the new Customs Code
27-10-2024

The topic of sanctions is of particular importance in EU Customs Law, as sanctions are relevant tools for ensuring the proper enforcement of the latter in EU Member States. In this regard, the Proposal of 17 May 2023 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority, and repealing Regulation (EU) No. 952/2013, highlights the negative effects of the lack of harmonization in terms of customs sanctions. It is emphasized therein that customs penalties vary greatly across Member States and are subject to evolution over time; in addition, the significant divergences between Member States in the application of sanctions against breaches of customs legislation can lead to a distortion of competition, loopholes and “customs shopping”.

Prof Fabrizio Vismara

€
violations
Case law
icon
Is payment of customs duties suspended if a dispute is brought before a court?
19-05-2024

Did you know that customs duties are one of the European Union's own resources? Therefore, when you challenge customs decisions to calculate customs duties, you are essentially challenging EU … revenue. In this overview of a recent judgement by the Court of Justice of the European Union, we answer the question of whether, in the event of a dispute with customs, the collection of import duties (customs duties and VAT) is suspended until the outcome of the proceedings is known.

Dr Aistė Medelienė

€
duties, taxes, violations
Case law
icon
Is payment of customs duties suspended if a dispute is brought before a court?
19-05-2024

Did you know that customs duties are one of the European Union's own resources? Therefore, when you challenge customs decisions to calculate customs duties, you are essentially challenging EU revenue. In this overview of a recent judgement by the Court of Justice of the European Union, we answer the question of whether, in the event of a dispute with customs, the collection of import duties (customs duties and VAT) is suspended until the outcome of the proceedings is known.

Dr Aistė Medelienė

€
duties, taxes, violations
Case law
icon
Two lessons from case law on the origin of goods
20-03-2024

Editors' note: The recent 20th Authors' Meeting dealt with issues of origin for customs purposes. At this meeting, the author presented two Israeli court cases - one concerning an unauthorised … person signing the certificate of preferential origin and the other concerning whether pistachios originated in Iran or Turkey (non-preferential origin for the application of prohibitions). The cases are not necessarily new, but they deal with relevant questions: What happens if the proof of preferential origin is signed by an unauthorised person? Can the authorisation be granted retrospectively? Is the 'statistical and reasonableness check' sufficient for customs to reject the declared non-preferential origin of the goods?

Omer Wagner

€
violations, origin
Case law
icon
Two lessons from case law on the origin of goods
20-03-2024

Editors' note: The recent 20th Authors' Meeting dealt with issues of origin for customs purposes. At this meeting, the author presented two Israeli court cases - one concerning an unauthorised person signing the certificate of preferential origin and the other concerning whether pistachios originated in Iran or Turkey (non-preferential origin for the application of prohibitions). The cases are not necessarily new, but they deal with relevant questions: What happens if the proof of preferential origin is signed by an unauthorised person? Can the authorisation be granted retrospectively? Is the 'statistical and reasonableness check' sufficient for customs to reject the declared non-preferential origin of the goods?

Omer Wagner

€
violations, origin
Case law
icon
Fraudsters in the supply chain: Who pays taxes as a result of fraudulently completed formalities?
01-10-2023

Presumption of guilt - you'll say it doesn't work that way. Unfortunately, in tax law, the taxpayer is presumed to be guilty of breaching the tax law unless he proves otherwise. The only question … is whether, even if proven not guilty, the taxpayer will not have to pay the tax. In a recent judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarified whether the owner of an excise warehouse (whose guilt has not been proven) will have to pay the suspended taxes (in this case almost €3 million) in a case where the evidence of the completion of the formalities has been falsified and where the goods have been transported to an unknown destination. The clarifications are important not only for the owners of excise warehouses, but also for all users of suspended tax regimes - transit, customs warehousing, temporary admission for processing and others - in order to better understand, assess and manage the risks involved. The CJEU has also clarified when goods are considered "lost" and no tax is due.

Ingrida Kemežienė

€
duties, taxes, violations
Case law
icon
Fraudsters in the supply chain: Who pays taxes as a result of fraudulently completed formalities?
01-10-2023

Presumption of guilt - you'll say it doesn't work that way. Unfortunately, in tax law, the taxpayer is presumed to be guilty of breaching the tax law unless he proves otherwise. The only question is whether, even if proven not guilty, the taxpayer will not have to pay the tax. In a recent judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarified whether the owner of an excise warehouse (whose guilt has not been proven) will have to pay the suspended taxes (in this case almost €3 million) in a case where the evidence of the completion of the formalities has been falsified and where the goods have been transported to an unknown destination. The clarifications are important not only for the owners of excise warehouses, but also for all users of suspended tax regimes - transit, customs warehousing, temporary admission for processing and others - in order to better understand, assess and manage the risks involved. The CJEU has also clarified when goods are considered "lost" and no tax is due.

Ingrida Kemežienė

€
duties, taxes, violations
Case law
icon
The Zes Zollner Electronic case: exploring the scope of amending customs declarations
25-06-2023

In a recent ruling, the Court of Justice (the Court) delivered its decision in the case of Zes Zollner Electronic, addressing the issue of amending customs declarations and the consequences of … failing to declare the correct quantity of goods. The case involved a Romanian company, Zes Zollner Electronic (ZZE), which declared only half of the actual quantity of goods received, resulting in a customs infringement.

Jonas Sakalauskas

€
violations, import
Case law
icon
The Zes Zollner Electronic case: exploring the scope of amending customs declarations
25-06-2023

In a recent ruling, the Court of Justice (the Court) delivered its decision in the case of Zes Zollner Electronic, addressing the issue of amending customs declarations and the consequences of failing to declare the correct quantity of goods. The case involved a Romanian company, Zes Zollner Electronic (ZZE), which declared only half of the actual quantity of goods received, resulting in a customs infringement.

Jonas Sakalauskas

€
violations, import
support@customsclear.net +370 664 26393 (EN, RU) 37066426393 (LT) +37064465553 (DE)
Login Sign up
Forgot password?

* Mandatory fields

By signing up you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Password reset

Check your e-mail, we sent you a link to reset your password.
Login with Google Login with LinkedIn
Contact us

Contact us

Thank you for report
Maximum file size 6mb
File is too large